Home / Exclusives / Peer-reviewed science violates several codes of conduct
bias in the dictionary
Getty image via NewsCred

Peer-reviewed science violates several codes of conduct

The research paper that supported the New York fracking ban has been deemed biased and has violated a minimum of four different codes of conduct for scientific research.

It has been brought to the public’s attention that the research report that is behind Governor Andrew Cuomo’s decision to ban fracking in the state of New York was peer-reviewed by active opponents of natural gas development.

On December 17, 2014, during a press conference, acting New York Health Commissioner Howard Zucker held up the “report” to the public as if it were authentic scientific research that supported his decision to bar fracking the New York.  The paper, which claims that oil and gas wells are producing potentially hazardous pollution levels, was composed by those with close ties to the environmental community, including anti-fracking organizations Global Community Monitor and the Center for Environmental Health.

Both organizations advocated the paper as a peer-reviewed science.  However, the journal that published the report stated the peer-reviews were conducted by Sandra Steingraber, Robert Oswald and Jerome Paulson, all of whom support anti-fracking.

Steingraber, Oswald and Paulson never mentioned an opposition to shale gas development in their reviewer reports.  Each of them claimed and stated: “I declare that I have no competing interests.”

The issues at hand are clear cut: the writers and peer-reviewers violated several codes of peer-reviewing and whether or not Zucker knew the report was biased.

To read the entire Breaking Energy article regarding the report behind the New York fracking ban, click here.


  1. The Scientific Method has not been applied to Hydraulic Fracting, Carbon Footprinting, or even to Climate Change or Global Warming and Cooling. A handfull of scientists can manipulate any dats or throw out dats that does not support their Hypothesis, Prediction, Experiments, and Observations to form a Theory. New York State and the Cuomo Jr. Administration are corrupted.

  2. That’s why you are from the agricultural and Vietnamese capital of Garden City, Kansas where there us nothing but prairie dogs, irrigation systems, and low level mud loggers…the first hydraulic fracting completion was in Hartville, Ohio, in 1950, not Kansas, Texas, or anywhere in the Midcontinent where there is nothing to do with the scientific method, physical or natural science, and you obviously are not a petroleum engineer, done scientific research, or been on any laboratory. Papers on mining operations use fracting too!!

  3. Hey Niles where did your comments go??? are you afraid to get called out and flatout proven Wrong?????

  4. LOL!!!!! poor old Niles had to block me because I made him look the fool, next time you blow your hole buddy make sure someone like me don’t come along and Prove you wrong with legit sources

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *